Strategy
3 months
|
SITUATION
ORGANIZATION
EXECUTIVES
inadequate commitment and motivation on the part of executives
lack of strategic orientation among managers - an excessive focus on daily tasks
insufficient communication and cooperation between the major vertical structures of a business organization
|
ADAPTABILITY
- organization adapts its strategy to changing market conditions, identifying and successfully pursuing the objectives that allow it to take maximum advantage of emerging opportunities and possibilities
COHERENCE
- discrepancies between viewpoints and priorities of different individuals and departments are harmonized so that the condition of the dynamic, creative balance is achieved
COMMITMENT
- managers know the strategy of the organization, they feel they are its co-authors and are motivated to its implementation
|
Performance
6 months
|
SITUATION
ORGANIZATION
EMPLOYEES
inadequate performance of employees and teams insufficient work efficacy and efficiency lack of time for important tasks insufficient self-leadership on the part of employees in the process of tasks prioritization too meticulous involvement of managers in the activities of employees (micro-managemnent) ambiguous division of responsibilities between departments and positions insufficient horizontal communication between positions that are not connected hierarchically
|
FLEXIBILITY
- tasks sets and priorities of individuals employees and departments seamlessly and fluently adapt to the current situation and strategy
EFFICIENCY
- employees’ energy is spent so that the smallest possible investment of time and effort brings about the greatest possible outcome for an organization
COOPERATION
- among all persons whose work is operationally inter-related, structured communication channels are created that ensure high quality and effectiveness of working together
|
Competences
3 months
|
SITUATION
- change in an organization's strategy that requires an adjustment of behaviors and competences of employees
ORGANIZATION
- lack or insufficient quality of human resources development strategy
- necessity to cut the budget of human resources development
- discrepancies between perspective and actions of HR managers and the expectations of the management board
- lack of clear benefits to the organization from the implementation of existing forms of employee competence development (training, coaching)
EMPLOYEES
- level of competences of employees is inadequately matched to the needs of job positions
- insufficient employee awareness of their own strengths and weaknesses
- unwillingness of employees to participate in the proposed forms of competence development
|
ALIGNMENT
- individual competence development processes are interwoven into a coherent network of synergistic actions
EFFICACY
- human resource development activities significantly assist the organization in achieving its strategic objectives
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
- accurate matching of development actions reduces costs of training activities
|
Climate
4 months
|
SITUATION
- change in strategy of an organizations that requires an adjustment of behaviors and competences of employees
ORGANIZATION
- low efficacy of change processes that are being implemented within an organization
EMPLOYEES
- inadequacy of the attitudes and behaviors of employees to managers' expectations and needs of an organization
- insufficient impact of training activities undertaken, which concerned the attitudes and behaviors of employees
|
GROWTH
- with creation of a suitable environment all development activities that target employees bring quick and lasting effects for an organization
REINFORCEMENT
- behavior and attitudes of senior managers and employees interacting with each other create permanent feedback loops that reinforce desired changes
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
- organization is able to reduce costs of developmental actions by eliminating ill-matched, not accepted or ineffective training investments
|
Key players
4 months
|
SITUATION
- change in the organization calling for an implementation of an unusual project or undertaking
ORGANIZATION
- low efficacy of change processes that are being implemented within an organization
- low efficacy of talent management programs
- poor quality internal recruitment processes
- excessive politicization of change processes in an organization that causes drop in effectiveness
EMPLOYEES
- insufficient involvement in ongoing change processes
- continuing departures of an organization’s most talented and valuable employees
|
KNOWLEDGE
- an organization is able to accurately identify and appropriately engage their most valuable employees and future leaders using powerful informal knowledge, hidden "beneath" official structures and relationships
CHANGE
- difficulties and resistance to implementation of changes in an organization completely disappear or at least are greatly minimized
APPRECIATION
- talented, outstanding employees feel appreciated and properly engaged by the employer, while in others aspirations are being waken up
|
Employees
2 months
|
SITUATION
ORGANIZATION
- unjustified high turnover on a particular position
- poor quality of recruitment processes for a particular job
- repeating recruitment failures
EMPLOYEES
- insufficient quality of communication and cooperation regarding the requirements for the job position for which recruitment is carried out
- difficulties of adapting new employees to the prevailing organizational culture and work style
|
ACCURACY
- the quality of all recruitment processes increases thanks to much more precise, multi-dimensional selection of candidates that are able to instantly satisfy the actual, contextual needs of an organization
COOPERATION
- quick formation of effective communication channels between the new job position and its organizational surroundings that ensures high quality and effectiveness of working together
ADAPTABILITY
- tasks and priorities for the new job position are optimally suited to the current situation and strategy of an organization
|